Announcments
  • REALIST NEWS: Where you don't have to worry about drama. No Spam posts and STAY ON TOPIC. This is an important news website.

When posting content located on some other website, please post no more than 20% of their content and always provide a link. Also, Multiple forum handles/IDs are NOT permitted.
If you see a spam post please click the "Report" button on that specific post. Also, what I don't want on my forum is name calling and cussing at people or direct insults. Thanks


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5G Technology Wireless - Look What Your Family is Getting Without a Choice!
05-28-2016, 09:53 AM (This post was last modified: 02-17-2018 07:46 PM by Thinker.)
Post: #1
5G Technology Wireless - Look What Your Family is Getting Without a Choice!
0
0
(Headline Story in Last Reply)


"Massive government study concludes cell phone radiation causes brain cancer"

(NaturalNews) After decades of denials and attacks by the media which called people concerned about cell phone radiation "tin foil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists," a massive, multi-year study funded by the federal government now concludes that yes, cell phone radiation causes brain cancer. The study is published here and it's entitled, "Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD rats (Whole Body Exposures)." "The findings, which chronicle an unprecedented number of rodents subjected to a lifetime of electromagnetic radiation, present some of the strongest evidence to date that such exposure is associated with the formation of rare cancers in at least two cell types in the brains and hearts of rats," reports Scientific American:
http://www.naturalnews.com/054165_cell_p...study.html

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
02-28-2017, 07:58 PM (This post was last modified: 02-28-2017 07:59 PM by Thinker.)
Post: #2
Microwave Cooking Worse than What's Known - It Causes Chronic Disease and Cancer
0
0
(The Best Years in Life) It's not EMF emissions that are the problem. The better ovens are supposedly well shielded. It's not the fact that nutritional value is lowered. Almost all cooking reduces some nutrients and vital enzymes that are needed to get nutrients into your cells. Instead, it's been scientifically determined that microwave cooked or heated foods and liquids create damaging substances that adversely affect consumers' DNA and are carcinogenic. The Germans were developing microwave cooking apparatus toward the end of WW II to increase troop mobility. Both the Americans and Russians grabbed their work and their papers after the war. The Americans simply decided to allow industry to grab the goods, but the Russians decided to determine if there were any health hazards involved. And they found them. Soon they banned microwave ovens in the USSR. When the iron curtain went down, so did that ban. After all, microwave ovens need to be sold. And whatever research showed microwave cooking hazards had to be hidden from public view.

The Buried Research

An American scientist named William P. Kopp discovered the Russian research some time after their ban on microwave ovens was lifted and the USSR had shrunk back to just Russia, which was no longer communist. He has attempted to publish those findings on a large scale. But he has been so marginalized and maligned as a fringe kook that microwave oven fans continue denouncing him today. This is nothing new. It's what industries do to researchers who discover what will reduce their revenue. A summary of the Russian studies that Kopp had attempted to circulate widely is available here. A more recent study was conducted independently in Switzerland around 1991-2 by Hans Hertel and Bernard H. Blanc of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the University Institute for Biochemistry. Hans was a food processing industry scientist who was fired for expressing his concerns over denaturing food. With the cooperation of Blanc and access to his laboratory equipment, Hans organized a small group of macrobiotic dieters to stay in a small hotel and participate in his study on microwaved foods under strict rules and supervision to exclude all other variable factors. Hans also participated as a subject. The findings that demonstrated harm from consuming foods from microwaving were published in a small journal in 1992. But the Swiss Association of Dealers for Electroapparatuses for Households and Industry, known as FEA, struck swiftly. They forced the President of the Court of Seftigen, Kanton Bern, to issue a 'gag order' against Hertel and Blanc. The threatened penalties for violating the gag order were so harsh, Blanc withdrew his study approval and recanted. But Hertel gave them the finger and fought on. He sued the Swiss government and the FEA. But it took almost six years for the gag order to be removed. In 1998, the European Court of Human Rights lifted the gag order and fined the Swiss government 40,000 francs to be awarded Hans Hertel. You can look over a summary of his study under the subtopic “Hans Hertel” from this article.


Applied Heat Cooking versus Microwave Cooking

Normally cooked food is heated from the outside in. This is the normal function of thermal dynamics: heat transfering to cold. Although raw food advocates will rightfully point out that cooking destroys nutrients, especially enzymes, normal cooking doesn't create nearly as much damage as microwave cooking. You may know that microwave radiation heats from the inside out. How is this accomplished? Hertel explains, "Technically produced microwaves are based on the principle of alternating current. Atoms, molecules and cells hit by this hard electromagnetic radiation are forced to reverse polarity 1 to 100 billion times a second."

"There are no atoms, molecules or cells of any organic system able to withstand such a violent, destructive power for any extended period of time, not even in the low energy range of milliwatts. (...) This is how microwave cooking heat is generated, friction from this violence in water molecules [of food]. Structures of molecules are torn apart, molecules are forcefully deformed (called structural isomerism) and thus become impaired in quality." (Emphasis added) Although the sun also emits microwaves, it's the AC current propelling microwave ovens that create an extremely rapid polar shift of the subjected water molecules. Hertel explained that the sun's microwaves are based on a pulsating direct current. This type of microwave radiation doesn't shear molecules because there is no rapid oscillation of polarity. Besides these thermal modifications, there is direct damage to cell walls and genes from microwaves. Gene altering technology, which includes the biotech food industry, alters genes by weakening them with microwaves. Hertel explained further, "... the cells are actually broken, thereby neutralizing the electrical potentials, the very life of the cells, between the outer and inner sides of the cell membranes." Unnatural and unclassified compounds are created by microwave energy's penetration into organic matter. They are called:
http://www.tbyil.com/Microwave_Cooking_C..._Fassa.htm



Microwave Ovens Kill Food, and Eventually, YOU!

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-29-2017, 02:25 PM
Post: #3
Fake Cell Towers Origins And True Purpose Revealed
0
0
A news report in 2014, and the answer to the question in 2017. Organization who commented on these towers in 2014 knew what they were and who was putting them up accourding to news today.


In 2006, big brother was aleady setting up for to get Americans used to looking at something different in their neighborhoods. Little did they know these cell towers and command centers may be listening to more than allowed.

2006 - Cell Phone Towers In Disguise (CBS News)


CELL TOWERS, SMART PHONES, CHEMTRAILS AND EMF WAVES, WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW!!!

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-03-2017, 06:47 PM (This post was last modified: 10-14-2017 05:55 PM by Thinker.)
Post: #4
Radio Frequency Mind Control - Proof of Existence - SELF EXAM BRAIN CHECK
0
0


2013 - WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW About ELF Waves, HAARP Capabilities & MIND CONTROL

Open description Box! This IS a re-upload of one of my previous videos yet posted as a refresher, a reminder for those of us AWARE yet may have allowed this to roll to the Back of our Brains. While this particular video reminds us of some of the things HAARP is capable of, it should be duly noted that Dr. Nick Begich is keenly aware of ALL that HAARP is capable of & PROVED it "live" & in person TO & ON JESSE VENTURA. With this being said I want to draw your attention to 2 other significant findings involving HAARP!

1- Cliff Carnicom has conducted research which shows that one of the "desired effects" of Chemtrails (desired by those who created the Monstrosity) IS that since everyone is effected as a result of inhalation & carries "MORGELLONS" fibers, when said fibers are subjected to certain wavelengths they MULTIPLY AT AN ALARMING, ACCELERATED RATE. REMEMBER the ZOMBIE SCARE in Florida where a man ate another man's face off while another ripped his own abdomen open & literally THREW his inner Organs at Police! This WILL MAKE a ZOMBIE out of you & us ALL with the right Frequency, INDEED, this is an insidious Weapon & SHOULD BE BANNED on a Global scale.

2- This being said, HAARP can also make people do crazy, criminal things - such as shootings, stabbings, beheadings etc. As is the case with an MK Ultra, the Targeted Individual will have no Knowledge or Memory of ever having committed a Crime, much as has been proven by Master Hypnotists that bring about the same end effects.

3- HAARP is an EXTREMELY DANGEROUS WEAPON capable of all this and more - such as manipulating or manufacturing Weather, forcing Earthquakes & ensuing Tsunamis. This IS the #1 Most Dangerous Weapon (including WMD) on the planet.
NEVER FORGET THIS & DO FEEL FREE TO RESEARCH THIS FURTHER! "It IS THE DEATH RAY!" Dr. Nick Begich.


January 2007 - Washington Post Article - "Thought Wars" - 10 Years Later - Game On!

The January 14, 2007 Washington Post Magazine article, Mind Games by Sharon Weinberger is stunning in it's coverage. The article is announced on the top front page of the Washington Post with the heading; "IS IT PARANOIA? OR THE PENTAGON? To most, the people who think the government is beaming voices into their heads are paranoid loonies in foil helmets. Trouble is, the government has pursued weapons tht could do just that." The full cover page of the Washington Post Magazine displays the picture and heading "THOUGHT WARS One thing is certain about the emerging subculture of self-described mind-control victims: Their agony is real" and the full article encompasses almost 7,500 words. The full article is posted below and is well worth reading. Weinberger seriously investigated the very controversial issue of alleged government mind control victims, a topic that mainstream media has avoided or has dismissed as conspiracy nut cases without further examination.

The article has opened the door to much needed debate and serious, impartial reporting and investigation. Not many human rights issues make it to the front pages of a national newspaper. The article represents a major step forward in mind control activism. A sincere thank you to Sharon Weinberger for your long hours of research and to the Washington Post for this very special opportunity! The article is an entertaining and realistic read, while at the same time, an accurate description of the psychological devastation and pain-filled lives of mind control victims. There were indepth interviews of Harlan Girard, director of International Committee on Offensive Microwave Weapons (website at http://www.icomw.org) and Gloria Naylor, author of 1996, a book on her experience of mind control. Naylor bravely and openly discussed taking antipsychotic medication for the voices she heard but the medicine did not stop the voices.

The mental health field has helped many people who report hearing voices but most mind control victims report experiences like Naylor, and have not found relief from the voices by using medication. Although most mental health experts do not believe the government is behind technology to cause the phenoma of hearing voices, most victims and their support groups leave it up to victims to decide what to do in regards to trying antipsychotic medication or seeking out mental health experts. Many desperately try medication to obtain relief. Ed Moore, a young medical doctor described his inspiring efforts to study for an electrical engineering degree in spite of voices that taunt him 24/7. There were several shorter comments by many other victims and also military and psychiatric experts. Weinberger described intelligent, talented, educated victims of mind control and that most are not mentally ill, as so often portrayed in the media. The experts in the article described victims as having "highly emotional and gripping experiences" and as a result, victims provide a "compelling narrative" to explain their perceptions of the experiences.

As an alternative explanation and the one that most mind control victims firmly believe, Weinberger also provided several sections on government research into mind control technologies such as beaming voices into peoples heads. Here are some relevant excerpts from the article, followed by short comments or questions IN CAPITAL LETTERS, for future debate and investigation. The biggest hurdle for TIs is getting people to take their concerns seriously. A proposal made in 2001 by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to ban "psychotronic weapons" (another common term for mind-control technology) was hailed by TIs as a great step forward. But the bill was widely derided by bloggers and columnists and quickly dropped. Doug Gordon, Kucinich's spokesman, would not discuss mind control other than to say the proposal was part of broader legislation outlawing weapons in space. The bill was later reintroduced, minus the mind control. "It was not the concentration of the legislation, which is why it was tightened up and redrafted," was all Gordon would say.

WHY WAS WEINBERGER UNABLE TO OBTAIN BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON A PROPOSED BILL FOR BANNING MIND CONTROL WEAPONS?

Concerns about microwaves and mind control date to the 1960s, when the U.S. government discovered that its embassy in Moscow was being bombarded by low-level electromagnetic radiation. In 1965, according to declassified Defense Department documents, the Pentagon, at the behest of the White House, launched Project Pandora, top-secret research to explore the behavioral and biological effects of low-level microwaves. For approximately four years, the Pentagon conducted secret research: zapping monkeys; exposing unwitting sailors to microwave radiation; and conducting a host of other unusual experiments (a sub-project of Project Pandora was titled Project Bizarre). The results were mixed, and the program was plagued by disagreements and scientific squabbles. The "Moscow signal," as it was called, was eventually attributed to eavesdropping, not mind control, and Pandora ended in 1970. And with it, the military's research into so-called non-thermal microwave effects seemed to die out, at least in the unclassified realm.

But there are hints of ongoing research: An academic paper written for the Air Force in the mid-1990s mentions the idea of a weapon that would use sound waves to send words into a person's head. "The signal can be a 'message from God' that can warn the enemy of impending doom, or encourage the enemy to surrender," the author concluded. In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: using microwaves to send words into someone's head. That work is frequently cited on mind-control Web sites. Rich Garcia, a spokesman for the research laboratory's directed energy directorate, declined to discuss that patent or current or related research in the field, citing the lab's policy not to comment on its microwave work. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for this article, the Air Force released unclassified documents surrounding that 2002 patent -- records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects, albeit with marginal intelligibility.

Research appeared to continue at least through 2002. Where this work has gone since is unclear -- the research laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it or release other materials. The official U.S. Air Force position is that there are no non-thermal effects of microwaves. Yet Dennis Bushnell, chief scientist at NASA's Langley Research Center, tagged microwave attacks against the human brain as part of future warfare in a 2001 presentation to the National Defense Industrial Association about "Future Strategic Issues."

"That work is exceedingly sensitive" and unlikely to be reported in any unclassified documents, he says.

Meanwhile, the military's use of weapons that employ electromagnetic radiation to create pain is well-known, as are some of the limitations of such weapons. In 2001, the Pentagon declassified one element of this research: the Active Denial System, a weapon that uses electromagnetic radiation to heat skin and create an intense burning sensation. So, yes, there is technology designed to beam painful invisible rays at humans, but the weapon seems to fall far short of what could account for many of the TIs' symptoms. While its exact range is classified, Doug Beason, an expert in directed-energy weapons, puts it at about 700 meters, and the beam cannot penetrate a number of materials, such as aluminum. Considering the size of the full-scale weapon, which resembles a satellite dish, and its operational limitations, the ability of the government or anyone else to shoot beams at hundreds of people -- on city streets, into their homes and while they travel in cars and planes -- is beyond improbable.

But, given the history of America's clandestine research, it's reasonable to assume that if the defense establishment could develop mind-control or long-distance ray weapons, it almost certainly would. And, once developed, the possibility that they might be tested on innocent civilians could not be categorically dismissed.

BASED ON THIS PRELIMINARY REPORTING BY WEINBERGER, MUCH MORE RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION INTO CLASSIFIED MIND CONTROL RESEARCH AND GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY IS CALLED FOR.

A former Green Beret who served in Vietnam, Alexander went on to a number of national security jobs, and rubbed shoulders with prominent military and political leaders. . . . Alexander also is intrigued by the possibility of using electronic means to modify behavior. The dilemma of the war on terrorism, he notes, is that it never ends. So what do you do with enemies, such as those at Guantanamo: keep them there forever? That's impractical. Behavior modification could be an alternative, he says.

"Maybe I can fix you, or electronically neuter you, so it's safe to release you into society, so you won't come back and kill me," Alexander says. It's only a matter of time before technology allows that scenario to come true, he continues. "We're now getting to where we can do that."

Contents | Top

Sharon Weinberger releases FOIA documents
cited in the Washington Post article "Mind Games"
to John McMurtrey

Sharon Weinberger has released her freedom of information (FOIA) documents from the Air Force Research Lab Directed Energy Division. A special thanks to John McMurtrey (website at: http://www.slavery.org.uk/science.htm) for sharing this information.
Adobe Reader pdf files

Disclosure & Record of Invention 560 K
Letter From O'Loughlin to Judge Advocate 600 K
Draft of Patent Part 1 2.6 M
Draft of Patent Part 2 2.8 M
Draft of Patent Part 3 2.3 M

One document is a 1994 initial patent by O'Loughlin for "A method for encoding and transmitting speech by means of the radio frequency hearing phenomena." The document stated: The uses of the invention by the government are described as: a) "A useful psychological warfare communications tool". . . c) A "no wires or receiving apparatus" communications method required for high acoustic noise environments such as: aircraft, space missions, and hostage situations. . . .

The final patent is O'Loughlin JP, Loree DL: Method and device for implementing the radio frequency hearing effect. US patent #6470214, Oct 22, 2002

Allen Barker, PhD and founder of mcactivism list group (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mcactivism/). Allen made the following relevant email comments on January 26th 2007.

One document [from Sharon Weinberger's FOIA request] is an Aug. 2001 letter from O'Loughlin to the Judge Advocate handling the patent case, and the other is a draft of the patent from 1994 which contains some different information than the final patent.

In the Washington Post article "Mind Games," Sharon Weinberger writes that she obtained "records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects, albeit with marginal intelligibility." But these were initial experiments, using:
http://mindjustice.org/wparticle.htm


NOW THAT YOU HAVE THE INFORMATION ABOVE, HOW MUCH OF THE INFORMATION IN THE VIDEO BELOW - FAKE NEWS? - 2013 - Edward Snowden Releases HAARP Mind Control Machine Documents? - WAS EDWARD SNOWDEN LYING OR THE MAN WHO MADE HIS VIDEO? ONE VOICE CAN MAKE YOU QUESTION THE TRUTH - RESEARCH FOR YOURSELF - HAARP!

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-27-2017, 01:42 AM
Post: #5
California Court Upholds Berkeley Cellphone Warning
0
0
A California court has upheld a law that forces retailers to warn customers about the potential health risks of cellphones. On Friday, a Ninth Circuit panel of judges ruled in favor of a Berkeley, California law which requires retailers to display warnings about the possibility of health risks from cellphones. The 2 to 1 decision rejects a legal challenge from the Cellular Telephone Industries Association (CTIA), a wireless industry trade group who challenged Berkeley’s so-called “Right To Know” ordinance in June 2015. The group claimed the law violates the First Amendment by forcing retailers to spread a message that they say is misleading. Circuit Judge William Fletcher disagreed, writing that because Berkeley’s cellphone warning is “purely factual” and is offering protection of public safety, it does not violate the First Amendment.

“Berkeley’s compelled disclosure does no more than to alert consumers to the safety disclosures that the FCC requires, and to direct consumers to federally compelled instructions in their user manuals providing specific information about how to avoid excessive exposure,” Fletcher wrote. “Far from conflicting with federal law and policy, the Berkeley ordinance complements and reinforces it.” Circuit Judge Michelle Friedland was the dissenting vote. Judge Friedland says the law promotes a “misleading” message that “carrying a cellphone in one’s pocket is unsafe.”

The Berkeley ordinance informs cell phone users that, “If you carry or use your phone in a pants or shirt pocket or tucked into a bra when the phone is ON and connected to a wireless network, you may exceed the federal guidelines for exposure to RF [radio frequency] radiation.” The ordinance also warns that the risk is higher in children. U.S. District Judge Edward Chen originally put a halt to the Berkeley law in September 2015 because of one line of text that was deemed unscientific. The language of the ordinance was later changed and then approved.

The CTIA filed their challenge shortly after, stating that the use of the word “radiation” was “fraught with negative associations” and would cause economic losses. Judge Fletcher Circuit Judge Morgan Christen found that the organization failed to provided proof that the ordinance would result in fewer cellphone sales.

Judge Friedland, on the other hand, said:
http://www.activistpost.com/2017/04/cali...-387796373


Effects of Mobile Phones on Children


MUST HEAR, & CIRCULATE: THE DANGEROUS TRUTH RE: CELL PHONES, CELL TOWERS, WIFI, SMART METERS

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-28-2017, 04:19 AM
Post: #6
Smart Phones to Send Data Through Your Bones with Bioacoustic Signals
0
0
Living online – and on the grid – is coming to life for many of the masses who will become part of the signal.


In 2008, one young bright man tried to tell cell phone users their phones, but age must have been a factor. He spoke about why your cell phone is probably killing you and said;

"I'm not trying to get anyone to stop using their cell phone as I understand this is unlikely. Use a regular corded phone while you're at your house or whenever it is convenient. Also, keep it AWAY from you in the room or preferably off while you're sleeping. Fifth-teen to thirty minutes a day on a phone over 10 years has been linked to tripling the chance of developing a brain tumor. I can't imagine what eight hours a night is doing when people sleep with it under their pillows right next to their heads. I just want everyone to be safe until cellular phones get regulated and we don't have to worry about this crap anymore.


Cell phones are also linked to insomnia, disrupted sleep patterns, headaches, and depression.

EMFs penetrate children and teenagers brains more than adults because of thinner skulls.

I would strongly advise taking this risk seriously and taking at least some measures to reduce your EMF exposure.

I'm writing a letter to congress about this and I would suggest anyone else concerned do the same. Hopefully this gets regulated as soon as possible and EMFs are able to be reduce or eliminated completely.

I made this because I'm worried about people who may be harmed by this and especially many of my close friends. Anyone who is interested in products that may help reduce this I am willing to research and find something that works for you. I'm not sure if there's anything genuine out there or not. I know headsets are a possibility but those can act as a lightning rod for other environmental EMFs so it's a mixed bag really.

Please take this seriously."

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-22-2017, 02:39 AM (This post was last modified: 10-14-2017 05:54 PM by Thinker.)
Post: #7
California Legislature Considers Placement of 5G Wireless Towers on Poles
0
0
Is California Setting Up Precedent For The 5G Wireless Takeover?

Many people are concerned—seriously, too—about a bill introduced into the California State Legislature dealing with the placement of 5G Wireless towers on poles every so many feet. “SB 649 is a bill that would eliminate local governments’ planning authority over wireless facilities on publicly-owned streets and properties, allowing the wireless industry to install 5G cell towers on every other power pole on your street,” according to Josh Hart at Stop Smart Meters.org. Folks, we have a real problem when 5 or 6G (gigahertz) cell towers (possible ‘thumb’ towers) will sit outside your house constantly emitting EMFs/RFs 24/7/36.

The San Francisco Chronicle published an editorial opposing industry cell antenna bills in California and other states. They called it “A brazen cell phone power grab” that

The telecoms are selling the measure as a way to:
http://www.activistpost.com/2017/07/cali...eover.html


Will California become the first "1984" new world order state with its 5g-wireless?

5G networks will use the same frequencies as pain inflicting crowd control weapons

5G networks will use the same frequencies as pain-inflicting crowd control weapons

No part of the country will be safe from ultra-high frequency signals.
We previously noted that the Internet of Things (IoT) is a scam … being pushed so that Big Brother can spy on us.

Believe it or not, IoT may also pose health and safety risks.

Devra Lee Davis – Founding Director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Founding Director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, who has taught at the University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley, Dartmouth, Georgetown, Harvard, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and other major universities, and has had articles published in Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association to Scientific American, the New York Times and elsewhere – says that the 5G wavelengths used in IoT have never been tested for health effects, and may adversely impact our skin and sweat glands:

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-31-2017, 01:33 PM
Post: #8
Why is the Federal Government Installing Mysterious Boxes on Utility Poles?
0
0
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives has claimed ownership of a mysterious box that was removed from a utility pole in Phoenix, Arizona. Phoenix resident Brian Clegg was concerned about a box he witnessed being installed on a power pole. Clegg said the box was facing his house and he believed it may have had cameras inside. The pole was owned by Arizona’s largest power provider, SRP, who claimed no one had permission to put the box on their pole. Brian Clegg says shortly afterwards SRP sent a crew to remove the box.

Shortly after ABC15 investigated the matter, the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives(ATF), a branch of the U.S. Department of Justice, acknowledged installing the box as part of an ongoing investigation. Officials with the ATF would not provide details about their alleged investigation and would not confirm if they were conducting surveillance in the area. “I don’t feel safer,” said Brian Clegg. “I feel that my privacy has been violated.”

SRP told ABC15 they were unaware the box had been installed and that the ATF has to notify them if they are going install something on their property. The ATF told ABC15 they can put security measures in place without asking for permission. Obviously the federal government feels comfortable doing whatever it wants to do, whenever it wants to, law be damned. One other interesting aspect of Clegg’s story is the fact that he claims the crew who installed the box came in a truck marked “Field Pros.” The thought of undercover government agents installing surveillance equipment while masquerading as utility workers is highly disturbing and sounds like a scene right out of a Hollywood film. Unfortunately, Phoenix is not the only city to have surveillance equipment installed by an agency of the federal government.

In November 2013, Seattle residents pushed back against the installation of several mesh network nodes attached to utility poles around the downtown area. The nodes were purchased by the Seattle Police Department via a $2.7 million grant from the Department of Homeland Security. The American Civil Liberties Union of Washington and privacy advocates were immediately concerned about the ability of the nodes to gather user information via the Wi-Fi connection.

“How accurately can it geo-locate and track the movements of your phone, laptop, or any other wireless device by its MAC address?
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/04/fede...poles.html

What did they say about the white squares on the top of the light poles in New Jersey? Was it a lie? How many different stories will be told about the survelience equipment being installed on telephone poles all over the U.S.?

The new world order wants to know what your doing and the technology to spy on people inside their homes is here. Why won't the truth be told? How many stories/lies will be told?


What are these mysterious white squares on N.J. traffic signals?

A question earlier this month about a new type of traffic signal that tells drivers when to stop for pedestrians crossing a road. Now, a reader has a question about the purpose of white squares he saw mounted on traffic signals on Route 130. "Most of them are on side of road," he wrote. "Some of them on Route 130 are hanging over the fast lanes of the road. They all seem to be hooked up to solar power panels on same pole."

He also sent us photographs, which we passed on to the state Department of Transportation.

Q: What are the white squares on top of these traffic signals?

A: We asked the DOT about the boxes. Here's what spokesman Kevin Israel told us.

"The square white boxes are the receivers for radios used to transmit data from one signal to another," he said. "The traffic signals communicate via radio waves about traffic volumes and other parameters at their respective locations." The system is called the Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System or SCATS. It was installed at 15 intersections on Route 130 and at two on Route 32, which are feeder roads from the New Jersey Turnpike, according to TransCore, the company that designed it. When those highways become congested from traffic leaving the Turnpike, SCATS adjusts the traffic light timing to provide longer green lights to move traffic, the company said. The system does that by measuring vehicle speeds as they roll across sensors under stop lines in intersections, according to a 2006 Rutgers study.

The system, which is in use in Mercer and Middlesex Counties, won an engineering excellence award in 2016. The DOT has other SCAT equipment in use in the state. One is part of a $12.5 million program to network 130 traffic signals in the Meadowlands region, which includes Route 17. Now that:
http://www.nj.com/traffic/index.ssf/2016...gnals.html


Why Is The Federal Government Installing Mysterious Boxes On Utility Poles? (3 Videos)

At the end of the first week in April, a mysterious box was spotted on a Phoenix utility pole that aroused the suspicions of a homeowner in the area who believed the box had surveillance cameras inside. After the homeowner involved the media, several days later the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives came forward, admitting that the box reported belonged to them, and that it was part of an ongoing investigation. Apparently the box was part of what has come to be known as a typical "Top Secret Obama" investigation, because neither local law enforcement, nor the electric company that owned the pole knew anything about the box, or ever saw a warrant. That seems to be the way Obama likes his investigations: As illegal as can be, and with zero oversight.

In the following video by Dahboo77, he explains how the box in Phoenix was the exact same type of box that Lavoy Finicum spotted on a pole outside the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Burns, Oregon. To find out about that box, Finicum climbed the pole and actually looked inside the strange box. Sure enough it was filled with surveillance cameras, so he ripped them all out. For anyone who doesn’t know, Lavoy Finicum was later assassinated in cold blood by the FBI.

First, check out the video below giving you a brief background of the most recent case of Uncle Barry's government gone wild, and then my intention for the rest of this post is to demonstrate other instances where the feds have been caught doing similar things. I suspect by the end of this post, some of you may not feel comfortable walking out of your home. Remember all this on election day, and whatever you do… DO NOT MISS THE FINAL EXAMPLE AT THE BOTTOM. Science fiction movies haven't even started using that kind of technology yet, but good old Uncle Sam is…

Before we get into the Phoenix story below, to REALLY understand how much you are being spied on, the earliest I could trace back easily obtainable information was back to 2008. When I first came across this back in 2012, there were three interviews with Dr. Katherine Albrecht linked below, but now only the second one is still active. I left the other two links so you could see their titles in the event someone wants to look for them. For anyone who doesn't know, Dr. Katherine Albrecht is an internationally known privacy researcher, consumer advocate, bestselling author, and nationally syndicated radio host. Katherine holds a Doctorate in Human Development and Consumer Education from Harvard University, has studied at the MIT Media lab, and received a Masters from Harvard in Technology, Innovation, and Education.

Katherine has authored pro-privacy legislation, testified before the Federal Trade Commission and numerous state legislatures, and was appointed as a consumer technology expert by NH Governor John Lynch. She co-authored the bestseller Spychips, has granted over 2,000 media interviews with news outlets around the globe, including CBS, NBC, CNN, NPR, Fox News, Good Morning America, the BBC, Wired Magazine, The New York Times, and hundreds more. Katherine is currently serving as the Associate Editor of the IEEE Technology & Society Magazine, co-authors an online security blog for eHow, and she heads the 18,000 member consumer privacy organization, CASPIAN.

BOTTOM LINE: Dr. Katherine Albrecht is the real deal, and she was warning back in 2008 about how out of control government was!!! Remember, only the second one :
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3428321/posts


Police cameras on power poles: Illegal 'unblinking eyes' or smart tricks of the trade?

Portland police Detective Travis Fields suspected two auto shops in North Portland were paying cash for stolen cars and crushing them to sell for scrap metal, but he needed more evidence. Fields asked an officer in the Drugs and Vice Division to plant video cameras on a utility pole across the street from the North Columbia Boulevard businesses to monitor what was going on. Officer Christopher Watts ended up helping arrange for the installation of six cameras trained at the two businesses, three related homes and a residential street. They recorded 24 hours a day, seven days a week, supplying more than 6,000 hours of video from Sept. 3, 2013, through April 2014. The images helped police identify 110 stolen cars taken to the two businesses.

Now, the eight defendants charged with racketeering in what prosecutors dubbed a family-run scheme are asking a judge to throw out the evidence captured by the cameras. They contend the surveillance violated their privacy and amounts to an illegal search because police never got a warrant to put up the cameras. Defense lawyers also are asking the court to suppress wiretaps conducted later based partly on the video evidence.

If they're successful, the judge's ruling could:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index...poles.html

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-16-2017, 11:42 PM
Post: #9
Wireless Warfare Exposed - Declassified Military Doc Proves Smart Phones Are Killing
0
0
We've been treated like guinea pigs and the lab results are in...smart phones are killing us! The current number of cell phone users today is 4.77 Billion and that figure continues to exponentially rise! Decades of cell phone use have now passed with a new generation of people coming into the world who have not experienced life without these devices! In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth goes over what the phone companies are telling you is a safe and acceptable level of exposure compared to what military documents have reported on as far back as the 1970's in terms of the clinical effects of microwaves and radio frequency radiation on human beings.

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-14-2017, 05:49 PM (This post was last modified: 10-14-2017 05:52 PM by Thinker.)
Post: #10
9/11 Gangsters Using Military Grade EMF Accelerants Used in Sonoma Napa FIRES?
0
0
Something turned these houses into in furnaces to allow for near complete combustion... the evidence of what we are seeing defies the laws of physics for an open air fire, I have ALREADY documented the wind speeds were marginal for the areas at the time the fires started. The fat that a tree is burning AS IF IT IS A FURNACE is noteworthy and should be of great concern to anyone educated prior to 1995 when physics and chemistry actually taught us what is possible with a mere open air burn v a furnace.

TOTAL combustion of material is NOT possible outside of a furnace, yet that is exactly the damage we are observing with temps reaching high enough values to MELT GLASS..


Intial Reports of California Fires: Mass Arson Event &The Diabolical Mantra (from the beginning)

From the START of these fires, the mantra has been illogical, non sequitur and hence, diabolical in nature. Use your eyes, use your brain.. do NOT drop the ball here or you're next.


US NAVY 5,600 mph RAILGUN - Navy's Gigantic Electromagnetic Railgun Is Ready for Deployment

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-21-2017, 07:45 PM
Post: #11
Mayor's & City Council Sellouts Putting Cell Towers in Parks, Schools, & Front Yards!
0
0
How much frequency can the human body handle? How many cell towers will it take to have every street and city wired? How many Mayors are paying to play for more wireless control and power? The new move buy your new world order phone service is putting towers in city parks, school playgrounds, and even in your front yard without your consent. Freedom and justice are leaving America, as the new world order moves in and turns a blind eye to the needs and health of the people. There is an agenda and insurance will take care of any health concerns. Ha, ha, ha!

The American People Getting Sold Out Once Again for Magnetic Warfare by Wireless Power?



Is 5G Trump's NEW WORLD ORDER?

There are some political positions that President Donald Trump has said he stands for that I can agree on. There are other areas of his political views that are highly questionable. In this video, I take a look at 5G, the connection to the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, and what Donald Trump plans to do with the tech as part of the innovation in his pursuit to #MAGA. There is also a possibility of #pedogate being part of the overall equation as well. While they seem separate, there are highly concerning connections to all of these topics.

The problem with 5G and the potential dangers to our health have been scientifically demonstrated.


Yet, there needs to be more transparency in addressing these health concerns, which I document in the video. However, as Tom Wheeler of the FCC announced in June of 2016, their mission is to more or less, “make America great again,” in the industry and innovation of 5G, just as the US were leaders in the 4G revolution. Will Trump recognize the health concerns and risks involved with 5G and hit the breaks on the roll out? Or will he push the technology ahead and encourage innovation, job creation, and building infrastructure in the quest to #MAGA?

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
02-11-2018, 03:30 PM
Post: #12
Technology EXPOSED! 5G, Cell Towers, Artificial Intelligence, iPhone X — REAL Agenda
0
0
Over a million dollars a day spent to electronically watch and target Realist News journalist Thinker for exposing the Trey Gowdy truth agenda. It's been so bad for Gowdy, that he is leaving the corruption and pedophiles of the new world order behind. Trump is next! With the invisible attacks on Christians and truth turning sinister, elite pedophiles in the highest positions are working hard to rid Washington of anyone who wants to expose them.

Trey Gowdy, since 2011 has exposed more corruption at the highest levels in Washington than ever before. Now like Cynthia McKinney, Gowdy who loved what he did, is now seeing how evil the beast can be. The invisible war on the mind and body of those who want truth, justice, and freedom for all is where missing money is going. Who wants peace, love, and unity? Who is doing everything to prevent that from ever happening?

Technology EXPOSED! 5G, Cell Towers, Artificial Intelligence, iPhone X — The REAL Agenda!

Per the "development" of 5G Technology, Apple has recently announced their latest iPhone X (iPhone 10) as of September 12th, 2017, with a release date back on November 3rd, 2017. This was alongside the iPhone 8 and the iPhone 8 Plus — also smartphones developed and marketed via Apple Inc. But how “smart” is “smart” technology really getting? How “smart” is your smartwatch? Or smartphone? Or smart TV? Is technology starting to replace the face of people? Is technology the new “smart”?

While much of the world eerily and ignorantly awaits the arrival of newer, smarter, and durable technologies, there is a more sinister plot courtesy the elite — That is, the weaponization of WiFi, cell phone towers, extremely low frequencies (ELFs), low frequencies (LFs), high frequencies, and other MK-ULTRA mind control methods pursuant to the plans and goals of the New World Order. These plans also involve the usage of 5G, artificial intelligence, robots, drones, Siri who is the voice for millions of phones, and Sophia The Saudi Arabian Robot (Official Citizen)…

While such technology is “acceptable” to much of the public world, could all of this be leading up to an Illuminati grand scheme? Could the weaponization of such technology REALLY unleash something even more sinister?

How do CERN, The Mandela Effect, D-Wave technology, quantum computers, and alternate realities ALL play a role?!

Will all of this play a role in The End Times?!

THE TRUTH REVEALED!!!

WAKE UP TO THE WORLD AROUND YOU!!!! AND AS ALWAYS, PLEASE SEEK YAHUAH AND HIS TRUE SON YAHUSHA — FOR EVEN MORE TRUTH!!

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
02-17-2018, 07:48 PM
Post: #13
5G Technology Wireless - Look What Your Family is Getting Without a Choice!
0
0
5g Technology for more power and control over the masses or faster way to a doctor visit?

In regards to 5G Technology; be very careful with using or even being around this new and presently being fazed-in, 5G technology. Why? Well, because it's very dangerous and tremendously toxic to Nature, Animals, Birds and Bees, Etc., and Humans' Biological System, on an Atomic and Cellular level. Featured Guest Speaker: Mr. Kevin Mottus; an Environmental Health Advocate from the California Brain Tumors Association.

Thinker, proud member of Realist News since Nov 2013.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Who Profits from Opioid Crisis? Meet Secretive Family Making Billions from OxyContin Thinker 5 1,113 Yesterday 12:10 AM
Last Post: Thinker
Lightbulb Moving Outside Of This System Comes Down To A Choice People4People 1 1,014 08-07-2016 01:15 AM
Last Post: Thinker
  Wireless Charging: A Surprising New Way To Track You Thinker 0 472 03-07-2015 02:10 PM
Last Post: Thinker
Shocked San Francisco Pays $3 Million To Family Of Woman Whose Body Was Found In Hospital People4People 0 837 01-29-2015 02:00 AM
Last Post: People4People
Exclamation Miss Colombia Judges Choice For Miss Universe, But Miss Jamaica Was People's Choice! People4People 0 868 01-26-2015 02:54 PM
Last Post: People4People
  Amazing Technology Invented By MIT Thinker 0 875 11-07-2014 09:32 PM
Last Post: Thinker
Video Aussie Family Drapes House With Half a Million Christmas Lights AdamAntium 0 1,086 11-26-2013 01:13 PM
Last Post: AdamAntium
Video Technology Can Help You Fake an Alien Invasion AdamAntium 0 861 03-23-2012 08:05 PM
Last Post: AdamAntium

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)