Sandy Hook Hoax Rebuttals

[razzle34dazzle]

All you do is attempt to dissuade people off the path from waking up. You debunk trending conspiracies trying to gain trust from the truther movement. But if you go back in history, you can see you were telling everyone that silver is only gona go down in price. That was back in June/July of 2012, and silver was at around $26. Then in august when it began to rally, hitting eventually $34.5ish. You completely disappeared. Now that silver is slipping, you come out of the woodwork, and again start trolling people off of the truth movement. I dont think youre a shill, just a narcissist who enjoys confusing truthers.  Looking back at the numbers, you can clearly see that the US Adjusted Monetary base spiked at $2,702,702,000,000.00 on august 8, 2012. It hadnt seen those numbers since march of 2012.  The price was being fixed into the market and silver began to rise. 

http://m.research.stlouisfed.org/fred/se...s&allobs=1

Now the Base is back at near $3trillion, silver is about to explode, and youre trolling GM threads. 

You make claims that silver is gona drop, while not sharing any fundamentals/technicals to back up your claim. You're posting hoax videos like this: 
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=DPIcz6WhjYI and then want people to take you as serious when you post sandy hook debunking material. 

I wouldnt take any of your posts as being sincere, you clearly are just leading people in circles. 

Again, i'm not hating on your vids, but im not buying into your agenda

[12GaugeAngel]

1. That is not what my silver video from july said.
2. In august there is another video talking about buying.
3. you are a gullible troofer who thinks the ridiculous theories actually make sense.
4. you are leading yourself in circles.
5. you are buying into everyone with an agenda. I don't have one.

[Uptodate32]

[razzle34dazzle]

Yea you posted a video looking at the technicals, you were saying you were waiting for it to drop to a certain point. Well it went the complete opposite direction. Then you magically disappeared

[12GaugeAngel]

(01-27-2013 12:33 AM)razzle34dazzle Wrote:  Yea you posted a video looking at the technicals, you were saying you were waiting for it to drop to a certain point. Well it went the complete opposite direction. Then you magically disappeared

BULLSHIT.
I didn't disappear. I showed a video with technicals, yes. I said price was in no mans land and I wouldn't be buying or selling at that time. Breaking a lower level would bring more selling, breaking a high level would bring more buying. I listed the levels. It broke higher, and my next video regarding silver was about finding an entry on a pull back. Honestly, it doesn't matter, because I didn't trade it. But i never said which direction it would go. I dont make predictions. Unlike you do >> remember this?? >> http://www.realistnews.net/Thread-first-...n-from-raz

there are many posts, just like that, with random ass ridiculous claims in them. nice work.

[12GaugeAngel]

(01-27-2013 12:27 AM)Uptodate32 Wrote:  

I'm pretty sure you meant this as an attack on me, but it is exactly my point. so, regardless of your intentions... thanks!

[12GaugeAngel]

BTW what does silver have to do with this thread?!

[Uptodate32]

(01-27-2013 01:12 AM)12GaugeAngel Wrote:  

(01-27-2013 12:27 AM)Uptodate32 Wrote:  

I'm pretty sure you meant this as an attack on me, but it is exactly my point. so, regardless of your intentions... thanks!

This is for everyone. If you took it upon yourself then yes it is for you. I posted this for a reason. And I got the exact response I was waiting for. However I have seen your videos and plenty of your posts 12g. I am not your enemy, am your friend. You seem like a very smart fella, not only book wise but I see the street smart in you. So you think about why people are lashing out against you. There is more then enough evidence for people to question the "Sandy Hook" incident. They feel like you are trying to make them look "crazy". And that is exactly what you are doing. But I really understand where you are coming from. People just take things to far.

[razzle34dazzle]

Whether i'm wrong or right with my predictions, i'm always sincere. Obviously, i was wrong with my first prediction, as of now, but over the coming year my prediction could pan out as true.

Now heres one of my better pedictions:
http://www.realistnews.net/Thread-wait-p...ime-to-buy

[12GaugeAngel]

(01-27-2013 01:28 AM)Uptodate32 Wrote:  

(01-27-2013 01:12 AM)12GaugeAngel Wrote:  

(01-27-2013 12:27 AM)Uptodate32 Wrote:  

I'm pretty sure you meant this as an attack on me, but it is exactly my point. so, regardless of your intentions... thanks!

This is for everyone. If you took it upon yourself then yes it is for you. I posted this for a reason. And I got the exact response I was waiting for. However I have seen your videos and plenty of your posts 12g. I am not your enemy, am your friend. You seem like a very smart fella, not only book wise but I see the street smart in you. So you think about why people are lashing out against you. There is more then enough evidence for people to question the "Sandy Hook" incident. They feel like you are trying to make them look "crazy". And that is exactly what you are doing. But I really understand where you are coming from. People just take things to far.

Understood. Thanks again.

[silversurfer]

[joelb79]

(01-27-2013 03:56 AM)silversurfer Wrote:  http://rense.com/1.imagesH/Feinstein%20®.jpg

link is dead.

[silversurfer]

(01-27-2013 03:58 AM)joelb79 Wrote:  

(01-27-2013 03:56 AM)silversurfer Wrote:  http://rense.com/1.imagesH/Feinstein%20®.jpg

link is dead.

http://rense.com/ Look now at the link while the artwork is still there.

[silversurfer]

Project Sandy Hook Explained

[lifesizebox]

Sandy Hook was a Hoax. Define Hoax: A humorous or malicious deception.

the malicious deception is that Adam Lanza had used a "Military Style Assault" Weapon. Also that the coroner said the victims were shot with a different gun than he supposedly used. Also, the media intentionally used drill footage and passed it off as Sandy Hook. But there are more Hoaxes - one of the biggest is that the media did not do it's job of researching and reporting the actual news.

That is just off the top of my head.... I still respect you 12g but I do disagree.

[joelb79]

(01-28-2013 01:40 PM)lifesizebox Wrote:  Sandy Hook was a Hoax. Define Hoax: A humorous or malicious deception.

the malicious deception is that Adam Lanza had used a "Military Style Assault" Weapon. Also that the coroner said the victims were shot with a different gun than he supposedly used. Also, the media intentionally used drill footage and passed it off as Sandy Hook. But there are more Hoaxes - one of the biggest is that the media did not do it's job of researching and reporting the actual news.

That is just off the top of my head.... I still respect you 12g but I do disagree.

You got all your information from the new media. Just because the news media reported things wrong and there is inconsistencies in the reports does not mean the government executed all those children. The only plan I can see that actually existed was with the news media to use this event to push an agenda, make money, and influence the next presidential selection. This whole conspiracy is narrow minded, without any merit, and has sidetracked people. In fact, if they news media did this just to marginalize and totally ruin any credibility left in the "truth movement": mission accomplished.

[13vocals]

I don't buy that there were actors, and that noone died, because I know from being a part of the machine that they consider it way more efficient to have an act actually happen as opposed to making it look like one did. Yes, I think they are capable of, but that's just because I have eyes. Hoax isn't a word i'd use for this event. False Flag, conspiracy, and the like? Undoubtedly, but a hoax for this would take too much luck to pull off.

[lifesizebox]

(01-28-2013 07:23 PM)joelb79 Wrote:  

(01-28-2013 01:40 PM)lifesizebox Wrote:  Sandy Hook was a Hoax. Define Hoax: A humorous or malicious deception.

the malicious deception is that Adam Lanza had used a "Military Style Assault" Weapon. Also that the coroner said the victims were shot with a different gun than he supposedly used. Also, the media intentionally used drill footage and passed it off as Sandy Hook. But there are more Hoaxes - one of the biggest is that the media did not do it's job of researching and reporting the actual news.

That is just off the top of my head.... I still respect you 12g but I do disagree.

You got all your information from the new media. Just because the news media reported things wrong and there is inconsistencies in the reports does not mean the government executed all those children. The only plan I can see that actually existed was with the news media to use this event to push an agenda, make money, and influence the next presidential selection. This whole conspiracy is narrow minded, without any merit, and has sidetracked people. In fact, if they news media did this just to marginalize and totally ruin any credibility left in the "truth movement": mission accomplished.

Good thoughts... Thanks for sharing.

[Illuminati Hater]

the problem is you come to the to this site
the look for a Debunked site

bush cheated 2000 election got me mad

they cheat then they lie once a cheat all way a cheat

[coldsteel333]

(01-25-2013 11:21 PM)12GaugeAngel Wrote:  The only fails I see are the responses in this thread. So you can't watch the videos? Too convinced of a lunatic conspiracy to at least take in the information from the other side? Truth Fail, Research Fail, and Critical Thinking Fail for most of you.

Anyway... The uber-doomtards that responded here were not the intended audience anyway. The readers and lurkers that are on the fence are far more numerous than the convinced and delusional.

Is this possible? video uploaded in Oct. 2011