Anderson Cooper CNN: Fake Background - Green Screen!

[Jsnip4]

[italianlad69]

I'm not an expert in green screen technology, that said, you can clearly see a women walking in front of the window, on the door, on the far right of the footage.

This, I believe might be akin to the "reptilian slitted eyes" that show up, anomolously, in videos similar to this.

[12GaugeAngel]

(01-25-2013 10:31 PM)italianlad69 Wrote:  I'm not an expert in green screen technology, that said, you can clearly see a women walking in front of the window, on the door, on the far right of the footage.

This, I believe might be akin to the "reptilian slitted eyes" that show up, anomolously, in videos similar to this.

Well the people moving around in the background does not prove or disprove the use of a green screen. Based on what I have seen in the above video, and the originally broadcasted interview, it appears to be a green screen for sure. I'd say there is a slim chance that the result is a video compression anomaly mixed with weird backlighting... so i guess that's possible too... i just side with green screen and here's why:

who cares if its a green screen? tons of "shots" seen on TV are made by compositing two video layers. This can even be done in real time and live. This can also be done "on the scene" with a mobile set up. Like in a building a block away, etc. It is done ALL THE TIME. I actually think that the mobile set up live broadcasted is very likely the case, hence the poor execution of the video overlay. Green screen mobile units can be incorporated into a news van. A green tent might be a better description. One camera shoots the newscaster, while another live shot of the immediate outside is broadcasted from another camera and the two pieces of video are composited.

It's ***** winter. Winter is cold and also windy... not ideal for shooting long segments of live television.

Green Screen is everywhere:

[SoberOne]

Perhaps an inquiry to CNN would reveal if they do it or not? I mean, based on how you describe it, it wouldn't be anything to hide, right? But then again, I would never believe anything that comes out of their mouths anyhow.

[12GaugeAngel]

nope. they should have no reason to hide the use of a green screen.

[italianlad69]

(01-25-2013 11:05 PM)12GaugeAngel Wrote:  

(01-25-2013 10:31 PM)italianlad69 Wrote:  I'm not an expert in green screen technology, that said, you can clearly see a women walking in front of the window, on the door, on the far right of the footage.

This, I believe might be akin to the "reptilian slitted eyes" that show up, anomolously, in videos similar to this.

Well the people moving around in the background does not prove or disprove the use of a green screen. Based on what I have seen in the above video, and the originally broadcasted interview, it appears to be a green screen for sure. I'd say there is a slim chance that the result is a video compression anomaly mixed with weird backlighting... so i guess that's possible too... i just side with green screen and here's why:

who cares if its a green screen? tons of "shots" seen on TV are made by compositing two video layers. This can even be done in real time and live. This can also be done "on the scene" with a mobile set up. Like in a building a block away, etc. It is done ALL THE TIME. I actually think that the mobile set up live broadcasted is very likely the case, hence the poor execution of the video overlay. Green screen mobile units can be incorporated into a news van. A green tent might be a better description. One camera shoots the newscaster, while another live shot of the immediate outside is broadcasted from another camera and the two pieces of video are composited.

It's ***** winter. Winter is cold and also windy... not ideal for shooting long segments of live television.

Green Screen is everywhere:

Ahhh.. Interesting. I guess it's hard for even seasoned people, who are good at discerning things around them, when the discussion itself becomes, its the norm for the MSM to use green screens, since the video itself, suggested that its very use, is a conspiracy..

See how easy it can be to fall into the trap?

[12GaugeAngel]

(01-25-2013 11:18 PM)italianlad69 Wrote:  

(01-25-2013 11:05 PM)12GaugeAngel Wrote:  

(01-25-2013 10:31 PM)italianlad69 Wrote:  I'm not an expert in green screen technology, that said, you can clearly see a women walking in front of the window, on the door, on the far right of the footage.

This, I believe might be akin to the "reptilian slitted eyes" that show up, anomolously, in videos similar to this.

Well the people moving around in the background does not prove or disprove the use of a green screen. Based on what I have seen in the above video, and the originally broadcasted interview, it appears to be a green screen for sure. I'd say there is a slim chance that the result is a video compression anomaly mixed with weird backlighting... so i guess that's possible too... i just side with green screen and here's why:

who cares if its a green screen? tons of "shots" seen on TV are made by compositing two video layers. This can even be done in real time and live. This can also be done "on the scene" with a mobile set up. Like in a building a block away, etc. It is done ALL THE TIME. I actually think that the mobile set up live broadcasted is very likely the case, hence the poor execution of the video overlay. Green screen mobile units can be incorporated into a news van. A green tent might be a better description. One camera shoots the newscaster, while another live shot of the immediate outside is broadcasted from another camera and the two pieces of video are composited.

It's ***** winter. Winter is cold and also windy... not ideal for shooting long segments of live television.

Green Screen is everywhere:

Ahhh.. Interesting. I guess it's hard for even seasoned people, who are good at discerning things around them, when the discussion itself becomes, its the norm for the MSM to use green screens, since the video itself, suggested that its very use, is a conspiracy..

See how easy it can be to fall into the trap?

HA! Yeah...
thing is, that it really WAS a conspiracy. It probably took 3 or 4 people to shoot the interview... that makes it a conspiracy for sure!
DOOOM DOOOOOOM DOOOOOOOOOOOOM

[SoberOne]

Everything might not be a conspiracy, but you gotta admit 12guage, there is some seriously fucked up ***** going on right now! Mainly the serious power grab and the disturbing drone policy.

[SoberOne]

Quote:Ahhh.. Interesting. I guess it's hard for even seasoned people, who are good at discerning things around them, when the discussion itself becomes, its the norm for the MSM to use green screens, since the video itself, suggested that its very use, is a conspiracy..

See how easy it can be to fall into the trap?

That, my friend, seriously mind-fvcked me.

[italianlad69]

(01-25-2013 11:12 PM)12GaugeAngel Wrote:  nope. they should have no reason to hide the use of a green screen.

I speculate, that if they desire to hide the use of a green screen, is because they might use it, more often, then not.. remember the 1991 CNN fake SCUD missile, and fake rain incident, showing they weren't even in the Gulf region?

[12GaugeAngel]

(01-25-2013 11:32 PM)SoberOne Wrote:  Everything might not be a conspiracy, but you gotta admit 12guage, there is some seriously fucked up ***** going on right now! Mainly the serious power grab and the disturbing drone policy.

well, those two things might be worth watching. along with a few others. the truly unbelievable theories are usually total bs though. distraction.

[12GaugeAngel]

(01-25-2013 11:36 PM)italianlad69 Wrote:  

(01-25-2013 11:12 PM)12GaugeAngel Wrote:  nope. they should have no reason to hide the use of a green screen.

I speculate, that if they desire to hide the use of a green screen, is because they might use it, more often, then not.. remember the 1991 CNN fake SCUD missile, and fake rain incident, showing they weren't even in the Gulf region?

YES! I do remember that. I think they are over the secret illusion thing though. just a guess.

[SoberOne]

(01-25-2013 11:36 PM)italianlad69 Wrote:  

(01-25-2013 11:12 PM)12GaugeAngel Wrote:  nope. they should have no reason to hide the use of a green screen.

I speculate, that if they desire to hide the use of a green screen, is because they might use it, more often, then not.. remember the 1991 CNN fake SCUD missile, and fake rain incident, showing they weren't even in the Gulf region?

I just watched the video you speak of. It plays almost like a Benny Hill short. I was laughing the whole time!

[SoberOne]

Well maybe that isn't the video you were referring to but it was still pathetic!

[italianlad69]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3s5e2XXfKc

With everything that is going on around us, however I feel it to be extremely important to heed the concept, spoken above by Bill Cooper. Especially today.

The ending, is my absolute favorite.. the Truth Movement..

[italianlad69]

(01-25-2013 11:46 PM)SoberOne Wrote:  Well maybe that isn't the video you were referring to but it was still pathetic!

That's exactly the video I was referencing!

[12GaugeAngel]

BTW: anything posted by this guy is GUARANTEED bullshit. He is a Sorcha Faal mouthpiece.

--
http://www.youtube.com/user/larrabeeg?feature=watch
--
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_qu...SnX0kBdv9M
--
so why does jsnip always post sorcha faal stories?? usually he marks them as important threads too... hmm. pretty suspect.

[nturegrl]

(01-26-2013 03:42 PM)12GaugeAngel Wrote:  BTW: anything posted by this guy is GUARANTEED bullshit. He is a Sorcha Faal mouthpiece.

--
http://www.youtube.com/user/larrabeeg?feature=watch
--
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_qu...SnX0kBdv9M
--
so why does jsnip always post sorcha faal stories?? usually he marks them as important threads too... hmm. pretty suspect.

To those who can see you,12G, you don't hide yourself very well.. How about you find a direction that is not 'scripted' in my opinion...i may be wrong, but i don't think that will turn out to be the truth in the end. blessings nontheless..you will know the truth, just as well we all will in the end....

[12GaugeAngel]

Confused young lady, IMO. Keep at it, you will see.

[Uptodate32]